[infinispan-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-1799) We should avoid using exceptions for flow control when acquiring state transfer lock
Galder Zamarreño (JIRA)
jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Thu Apr 26 07:02:18 EDT 2012
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1799?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Galder Zamarreño updated ISPN-1799:
-----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 5.1.4.FINAL
(was: 5.2.0.FINAL)
Bugzilla References: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=765759 (was: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=765759)
> We should avoid using exceptions for flow control when acquiring state transfer lock
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-1799
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1799
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: State transfer
> Affects Versions: 5.1.0.FINAL
> Reporter: Dan Berindei
> Assignee: Dan Berindei
> Fix For: 5.1.4.FINAL
>
>
> We currently use `StateTransferInProgressException` as a marker that a write command failed to acquire the state transfer lock and it should be retried. With ISPN-1704 I added another exception, StateTransferLockReacquisitionException, to signal that a write command failed to re-acquire the state transfer lock after it had already acquired it.
> These exceptions often appear in the logs and confuse users (see ISPN-1610), so it would be best to use special return values. We may also need a flag in the InvocationContext for StateTransferLockReacquisitionException.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the infinispan-issues
mailing list