[infinispan-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-3426) L1 inconsistency in tx caches when backup owner replies to remote get
Pedro Ruivo (JIRA)
jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Tue Aug 20 13:39:26 EDT 2013
Pedro Ruivo created ISPN-3426:
---------------------------------
Summary: L1 inconsistency in tx caches when backup owner replies to remote get
Key: ISPN-3426
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3426
Project: Infinispan
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 6.0.0.Alpha2
Reporter: Pedro Ruivo
Assignee: Mircea Markus
Fix For: 6.0.0.Final
Consider the following scenario
{noformat}node1: performs a remote get
node2 (backup owner): receives and replies to the remote get with v1
node1: receives the repli and store in L1_ key => v1
node2 (backup owner): commits a new value (v2) for the key (i.e. processes a commit command)
node3 (primary owner): sends the invalidation (but not for node1 because it hasn't received the remote get yet) and commits a new value (v2) for the key (i.e. processes a commit command)
node3 (primary owner): replies to the remote get with v2
node1: ignores the reply because it used the node2 reply
{noformat}
*conclustion*: node1 keeps the old value stored in L1.
Possible solutions described here:
[L1 consistency for transactional caches|http://markmail.org/thread/ckbihuj5ch7qtdzj]
Could also be interesting:
[Staggered get question|http://markmail.org/thread/qun2frj2u5a2hnj2]
and
[ISPN-825|https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-825]
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the infinispan-issues
mailing list