[infinispan-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-2300) Versioned Transactional Cache issues
Mircea Markus (JIRA)
jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Mon Jan 14 08:21:22 EST 2013
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-2300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12745610#comment-12745610 ]
Mircea Markus commented on ISPN-2300:
-------------------------------------
{quote}My gut feeling is that to fix this properly there really should be 2 flags, one to indicate if the conditional operation succeeded or not, the 2nd to indicate whether the command should make a change in the container. The latter flag, based on the 1st flag, would decide which value to put in the container, the previous value (if conditional operation failed), or the new value (if conditional flag suceeded).{quote}
We already have two flags (isChanged and WriteCommand.isSuccessful), can't we use these?
> Versioned Transactional Cache issues
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-2300
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-2300
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Transactions
> Affects Versions: 5.2.0.Alpha3
> Reporter: Pedro Ruivo
> Assignee: Galder Zamarreño
> Priority: Critical
> Labels: Commands, Conditional, Transactions, Version
> Fix For: 5.2.0.CR2, 5.2.0.Final
>
>
> Description from http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/infinispan-dev/2012-September/011205.html
> 1) testPutIfAbsent, testRemoveIfPresent, testReplaceWithOldVal (methods
> the test cases)
> In this tests, it was updating the cache entry with a null version. This
> originates later a IllegalStateException when it tries to perform the
> write skew check and the version is null.
> I have fixed this problem in this way: if the command fails (PutCommand,
> RemoveCommand, ReplaceCommand), I unset the flag CHANGED in the
> MvccEntry to avoid to update the entry in the DataContainer.
> 2) testClear in distributed mode
> I have no clear idea how to solve this problem but it looks like the
> PrepareCommand (with the ClearCommand) is not sent to all the nodes in
> the cluster. Then, when I do a get, a remote get is performed and the
> key is still there. I think that it is not the desired behavior.
> 3) testRemoveUnexistingEntry
> In this test, it tries to remove a key that does not exists but it does
> not success due to a NullPointerException. I have looked deeper and I
> check that the transaction's lookup entries map has an entry with [key
> => null] and when it tries to perform the write skew check in that key,
> a NullPointerException is thrown in here [2] (line 80, WriteSkewHelper)
> [1] https://github.com/pruivo/infinispan/tree/t_replace_fix
> [2] https://github.com/pruivo/infinispan/blob/t_replace_fix/core/src/main/java/org/infinispan/transaction/WriteSkewHelper.java#L80
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the infinispan-issues
mailing list