[infinispan-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-2990) L1ManagerImpl doesn't reliably invalidate with async caches

Bela Ban (JIRA) jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Wed Jun 5 09:57:55 EDT 2013


    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-2990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12779531#comment-12779531 ] 

Bela Ban commented on ISPN-2990:
--------------------------------

If you're referring to the ordering between unicasts and multicasts then yes, there is no ordering between them
                
> L1ManagerImpl doesn't reliably invalidate with async caches
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ISPN-2990
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-2990
>             Project: Infinispan
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Distributed Cache
>    Affects Versions: 5.2.1.Final
>            Reporter: Sebastian Tusk
>            Assignee: William Burns
>              Labels: onboard
>
> B is owner of k,v1
> A has k,v1 in L1
> 1. TX: A puts k,v2
> 2. TX: A sends async PrepareCommand k,v2 to B (one-phase-commit)
> 3. TX: A removes k,v1 from L1
> 4. A putForExternalRead k,v1 and has it in L1 again
> 5. TX: B executes PrepareCommand k,v2 but doesn't send invalidation to origin
> Result: A has k,v1 and B has k,v2
> Solution: For async caches send invalidation to origin too.
> The problem is that the owner updates the cache entry asynchronously. This gives the origin of the transaction time to request the entry. Here an outdated version is received and placed in L1. The owner never invalidates the entry and as result the cache is inconsistent.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


More information about the infinispan-issues mailing list