[infinispan-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-3128) Better support for (Spring) read caching
Mike Noordermeer (JIRA)
jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Wed May 22 08:55:06 EDT 2013
Mike Noordermeer created ISPN-3128:
--------------------------------------
Summary: Better support for (Spring) read caching
Key: ISPN-3128
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3128
Project: Infinispan
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: Spring integration
Affects Versions: 5.3.0.Beta2
Environment: Spring 3.1+
Reporter: Mike Noordermeer
Assignee: Mircea Markus
We're having a bit of an issue using Infinispan as backing cache for Spring's Caching annotations. The reasons are clear, but I haven't found a proper solution yet. I thought I would describe the issues in a feature request, so we can try to make the necessary changes to fix the situation.
As already described in [the forums|https://community.jboss.org/thread/201086], an Infinispan cache in invalidation mode sends an invalidation message to other cache nodes if something is put into the cache. This conflicts with Spring's idea of {{@Cacheable}} annotations, which are ment to provide read caching for methods. Imagine the following scenario:
- Method A is annotated with {{@Cacheable}}, backed by a cache in invalidation mode
- Node X calls Method A, the method is executed and the return value is locally cached (and an invalidation message is sent to Node Y)
- Node Y calls Method A, the method is executed and the return value is locally cached, *also, the cache of Node X is invalidated*
- Node X calls Method A and has to execute the method again, since its cache is gone, etc... etc...
The reason we want to be able to invalidate the read cache, is because if the application executed an update method for the underlying data (usually marked with {{@CacheEvict}} or {{@CachePut}}) we *do* want to invalidate the other ndoes.
In Infinispan, this problem can be solved by caching using {{cache.putForExternalRead()}}. That will not invalidate other caches on a put, but will invalidate the cache when asked explicitly. However, simply changing {{put()}} to {{putForExternalRead()}} in {{SpringCache}} leads to a couple of other issues:
- This is probably not the behaviour everyone wants (people that do not use Spring annotations, but expect the usual Infinispan behaviour).
- Changing {{put()}} to {{putForExternalRead()}} would break the expected {{@CachePut}} behaviour (a new value is generated, so the old values should be invalidated), but it would fix {{@Cacheable}} behaviour.
Maybe there should be an option in the factory bean to switch between {{put()}} and {{putForExternalRead()}}? Maybe Spring should change or amend its interface so we can differentiate between calls coming from {{@CachePut}} and calls coming from {{@Cacheable}}?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the infinispan-issues
mailing list