[infinispan-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-3905) Murmurhash3 implementation is slow on String keys
Dan Berindei (JIRA)
issues at jboss.org
Fri Dec 4 05:02:00 EST 2015
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13137011#comment-13137011 ]
Dan Berindei commented on ISPN-3905:
------------------------------------
[~sannegrinovero] We know {{String.hashCode()}} is much faster than MurmurHash3 when we're calling it repeatedly on the same {{String}} instance. I was wondering if it's still much faster when each call happens on a new {{String}} instance.
> Murmurhash3 implementation is slow on String keys
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-3905
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3905
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: Core
> Affects Versions: 6.0.0.Final, 6.0.1.Final
> Reporter: Sanne Grinovero
> Assignee: Dan Berindei
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 8.1.0.Final
>
>
> String instances are a common choice for being used as key entries, still the getBytes() operation being performed allocates costly buffers, and the computation to get those bytes looks like expensive too.
> I suspect there might be good reasons for not using the String's own hashcode directly as an input to Murmurhash? Still that's what other implementations seem to do.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
More information about the infinispan-issues
mailing list