[infinispan-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-3795) QueryInterceptor incorrectly relies on the return value of a RemoveCommand
Gustavo Fernandes (JIRA)
issues at jboss.org
Mon May 15 13:41:00 EDT 2017
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3795?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406529#comment-13406529 ]
Gustavo Fernandes commented on ISPN-3795:
-----------------------------------------
[~sannegrinovero] Could it be that when IGNORE_RETURN_VALUE was introduced, the overhead of indexing was orders of magnitude higher than today, given that previously it was doing 1 commit per entry? After that we add transparent batching to Hibernate Search SYNC backend, plus the async indexing backend, I reckon performance is vastly superior to do batch loading nowadays.
We could allso introduce a way to temporarily enable async indexing to do batch loading, which will always beat the sync option.
> QueryInterceptor incorrectly relies on the return value of a RemoveCommand
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-3795
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3795
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Embedded Querying
> Affects Versions: 6.0.0.Final
> Reporter: Dan Berindei
> Assignee: Gustavo Fernandes
>
> QueryInterceptor uses the return value from RemoveCommand/ReplaceCommand to remove the value from the index.
> But both RemoveCommand and ReplaceCommand have a variant with an expected value parameter, and this variant return a boolean value instead of the removed/replaced value. In that case, the previous value won't be removed from the index.
> QueryInterceptor should probably use the previous value from the context entries to update the index instead.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
More information about the infinispan-issues
mailing list