[infinispan-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-8993) LocalTopologyManager should not install a reset topology before conflict resolution
Dan Berindei (JIRA)
issues at jboss.org
Tue Mar 27 08:32:00 EDT 2018
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Dan Berindei updated ISPN-8993:
-------------------------------
Status: Pull Request Sent (was: Open)
Git Pull Request: https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/pull/5866
> LocalTopologyManager should not install a reset topology before conflict resolution
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-8993
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8993
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Core
> Affects Versions: 9.2.0.Final
> Reporter: Dan Berindei
> Assignee: Dan Berindei
> Fix For: 9.2.1.Final
>
>
> When the coordinator changes, either because the old one left or because there was a merge, the new coordinator first resets any ongoing rebalance, and then starts a rebalance with the new members. But some nodes could see the post-merge rebalance before the post-merge reset, and they need to reset any old data or inbound transfers first.
> [LocalTopologyManagerImpl|https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/blob/22a1fc0b2dae9dd9c5fdedc05b2d9daf9d292308/core/src/main/java/org/infinispan/topology/LocalTopologyManagerImpl.java#L418] is responsible for faking that reset topology update, in order to keep StateConsumerImpl simpler. The problem is that LocalTopologyManagerImpl also creates a reset topology update if the new coordinator started conflict resolution, and that topology update clears all the segments not owned by the local node in the preferred topology.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
More information about the infinispan-issues
mailing list