[infinispan-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-9206) Handle long qualified region names more efficiently

[Sanne Grinovero (JIRA)]

    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-9206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13581598#comment-13581598 ] 

Sanne Grinovero commented on ISPN-9206:
---------------------------------------

But how do you know if there's a conflict?

Also, I wouldn't want to have advanced flags and options which are user's responsibility to get right if we can't clearly explain when there's need. You also need to ship a safe default, what would that be?

I agree with your hopes on not allowing "intentional stealing" by a _different_ deployment unit. We still need to make sure to guard about unintentional stealing though.

> Handle long qualified region names more efficiently
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ISPN-9206
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-9206
>             Project: Infinispan
>          Issue Type: Enhancement
>          Components: Hibernate Cache
>    Affects Versions: 9.2.2.Final, 9.3.0.Beta1
>            Reporter: Radim Vansa
>            Assignee: Radim Vansa
>
> Hibernate region names are FQCNs, and when the prefix is added this can exceed the 255 byte ByteString limit. Also, it's inefficient to ship such long cache names with each command.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)