[jboss-as7-dev] Subsystem testing harness
Kabir Khan
kabir.khan at jboss.com
Thu Aug 4 11:16:13 EDT 2011
When calling installInController() it now attempts to validate the operations against the subsystem description providers
On 1 Aug 2011, at 12:11, Kabir Khan wrote:
> I moved the normalizeXml() method into AbstractSubsystemTest along with a few other small tweaks: https://github.com/jbossas/jboss-as/commit/0d3de0f834b0af7f7a0ca87e1c79c7aa50c491c1
> On 25 Jul 2011, at 15:37, David Bosschaert wrote:
>
>> Hi Kabir,
>>
>> It works for me. It allows for the following generic code to test
>> read+write of any subsystem :)
>> String subsystemXML = "..."; // my subsystem XML
>> KernelServices services = installInController(new
>> EmptyAdditionalInitialization() {
>> @Override
>> public Type getType() {
>> return Type.MANAGEMENT;
>> }
>> }, subsystemXml);
>> ModelNode model = services.readWholeModel();
>> String marshalled = outputModel(model);
>> Assert.assertEquals(normalizeXML(subsystemXml),
>> normalizeXML(marshalled));
>>
>> Note that I used a normalizeXML method to treat the XML strings before
>> using string compare to evaluate them. It takes into account things like
>> normalizing attribute order, ignoring comments and pretty-printing
>> elements to make sure that they are organized the same way. It might be
>> an idea to add normalizeXML() to AbstractSubsystemTest. I've pasted it
>> below.
>>
>> Cheers & thanks!
>>
>> David
>>
>> /**
>> * Normalize and pretty-print XML so that it can be compared using
>> string compare.
>> * The following code does the following:
>> * - Removes comments
>> * - Makes sure attributes are ordered consistently
>> * - Trims every element
>> * - Pretty print the document
>> * @param xml The XML to be normalized
>> * @return The equivalent XML, but now normalized
>> */
>> private String normalizeXML(String xml) throws Exception {
>> // Remove all white space adjoining tags ("trim all elements")
>> xml = xml.replaceAll("\\s*<", "<");
>> xml = xml.replaceAll(">\\s*", ">");
>>
>> DOMImplementationRegistry registry =
>> DOMImplementationRegistry.newInstance();
>> DOMImplementationLS domLS = (DOMImplementationLS)
>> registry.getDOMImplementation("LS");
>> LSParser lsParser =
>> domLS.createLSParser(DOMImplementationLS.MODE_SYNCHRONOUS, null);
>>
>> LSInput input = domLS.createLSInput();
>> input.setStringData(xml);
>> Document document = lsParser.parse(input);
>>
>> LSSerializer lsSerializer = domLS.createLSSerializer();
>> lsSerializer.getDomConfig().setParameter("comments", Boolean.FALSE);
>> lsSerializer.getDomConfig().setParameter("format-pretty-print",
>> Boolean.TRUE);
>> return lsSerializer.writeToString(document);
>> }
>>
>>
>> On 21/07/2011 16:16, Kabir Khan wrote:
>>> It has changed slightly after some comments from Brian and Emanuel. New commit is here: https://github.com/kabir/jboss-as/commit/e5144e1c6832756408f9385ed21b4df6abe49a33
>>>
>>> AdditionalInitialization.getType() == MANAGEMENT forces the non-install of services now
>>> On 21 Jul 2011, at 16:43, David Bosschaert wrote:
>>>
>>>> Nice, thanks Kabir!
>>>>
>>>> I'll play around with that soon!
>>>>
>>>> David
>>>>
>>>> On 21/07/2011 15:37, Kabir Khan wrote:
>>>>> My https://github.com/kabir/jboss-as/commits/parsing-harness contains some adjustements.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/kabir/jboss-as/commit/8f6538850604e0633c34c27d6fa70bb81dc180de#L6R108
>>>>> shows how to invoke the ops without doing the RUNTIME part of the operation handlers, i.e. services will not get installed.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/kabir/jboss-as/commit/8f6538850604e0633c34c27d6fa70bb81dc180de#L6R186
>>>>> shows how to just marshall a raw model to xml.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 20 Jul 2011, at 16:40, David Bosschaert wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 20/07/2011 15:34, Kabir Khan wrote:
>>>>>>> You need to start up MSC to get reference to the model controller since that is the only real way to get hold of the model controller. I guess you are saying you want the model changes and associated persistence of the xml to happen when invoking your ops, but not the installation of services?
>>>>>> Yes, from a unit testing point of view that would be nice :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Currently I can test the reading part as a unit without causing any side effects in the system, i.e. XML -> ModelNodes
>>>>>> It would be great to be able to test the writing part as a unit too: ModelNodes -> XML
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> David
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>> jboss-as7-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
> jboss-as7-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
More information about the jboss-as7-dev
mailing list