[jboss-as7-dev] json vs custom parser

[David M. Lloyd]

I dunno I think this would be more work than just writing a trivial 
little JS marshaller.  I think changing the native Java API to 
accommodate GWT is taking it too far - I mean we're talking about making 
these things not serializable.

On 02/02/2011 10:20 AM, Jason T. Greene wrote:
> That's an interesting idea. If nothing else we could use GWT to port it
> javascript once, implement the IO bits in native javascript, and then
> maintain the whole thing as just a javascript library. Then you could
> use JSNI to talk to it.
>
> Initally I am doing JSON over HTTP, but we could also do binary-dmr over
> HTTP following this approach. We could use a simple http header to
> indicate the need for the binary response.
>
> On 2/2/11 3:37 AM, Heiko Braun wrote:
>>
>> Would it be possible to decouple the marshalling components from the raw model?
>> This would allow us to re-use ModelNode, etc directly in GWT without having to write
>> another parallel hierarchy. The problems in this case are the imports on java.io, etc that the GWT
>> compiler chokes on.
>>
>> Ike
>>
>> On Feb 2, 2011, at 2:27 AM, David M. Lloyd wrote:
>>
>>> It's in ModelNode (readExternal and writeExternal).
>>>
>>> On 02/01/2011 07:14 PM, Scott Stark wrote:
>>>> Where are the binary protocol handlers located?
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>> jboss-as7-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>
>


-- 
- DML