[jboss-as7-dev] Secure HTTP API Endpoint
Heiko Braun
hbraun at redhat.com
Mon Jun 6 02:52:21 EDT 2011
+1
On Jun 2, 2011, at 6:08 PM, Brian Stansberry wrote:
> After lots of back and forth, the plan is to:
>
> 1) Ship unsecured
> 2) Ship a secure-mgmt.cli script that can be executed from the CLI
>
> ./jboss-admin.sh --file secure-mgmt.cli
>
> 3) Include in the domain/configuration and standalone/configuration dirs a properties file with a commented out user
>
> #admin=CHANGEIT
>
> Darran is going to take care of implementing and documenting this.
>
> On 5/31/11 6:59 AM, Heiko Braun wrote:
>> Still, none of these concerns have anserwered my initial question. Will it be secured by default? Who takes care of it? Where will it be documented?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On May 31, 2011, at 10:50, Darran Lofthouse<darran.lofthouse at jboss.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes the sample posted was for a quick out of the box config, in addition to that for the separation of configuration we do also have a properties file based approach.
>>>
>>> Both will support an obfuscated form of the password and once I have had a chance to review the SASL mechanisms used in the Remoting integration I will be looking to store these as pre-prepared hashes which if compromised would only be useable for a specific user against a specific security realm. If a single user used the same password against multiple realms then the hash would not be usable against the other realms.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Darran Lofthouse.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 05/26/2011 03:51 PM, Andrig Miller wrote:
>>>> I know that from the security side of things, we are trying to make sure that usernames and passwords don't end up in configuration files.
>>>>
>>>> I think we should rope in Anil and company into this discussion.
>>>>
>>>> Andy
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Heiko Braun"<hbraun at redhat.com>
>>>>> To: "Remy Maucherat"<rmaucher at redhat.com>
>>>>> Cc: jboss-as7-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 1:57:08 AM
>>>>> Subject: Re: [jboss-as7-dev] Secure HTTP API Endpoint
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> In general I would agree with your approach.
>>>>>
>>>>> But AFAIK the HTTP API endpoint doesn't support authorization
>>>>> schemes.
>>>>> So no roles in this case.
>>>>>
>>>>> On May 26, 2011, at 9:39 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The right solution is to require some special role for any admin or
>>>>>> management operations, but not provide any default user having it.
>>>>>> So,
>>>>>> locked down by default.
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>>>>> jboss-as7-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>>>> jboss-as7-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>> jboss-as7-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>
>
> --
> Brian Stansberry
> Principal Software Engineer
> JBoss by Red Hat
More information about the jboss-as7-dev
mailing list