[jboss-as7-dev] Deployment terms in CLI

[Heiko Braun]

I wouldn't mind if the command stays the way it is. 
But then the operation name on a deployment needs to be changed.
For instance to :enable and :disable opposed to :deploy, because that already 
taken by the command name.

It would make sense, because the deployment carries and attribute name "enabled" already.

If just look at the CLI on it's it makes perfect sense they way you build it.
But if regards the operation, the CLI commands, and the model description
you will realize that all three diverged at some point and rely on their own specific terms.

Ike


On Jun 22, 2011, at 1:18 PM, Alexey Loubyansky wrote:

> Just re-naming the current deploy command to upload doesn't sound nice 
> to me.
> Because the command actually deploys the package (unless you add 
> --disabled). So, it's as clear as it can be.
> 
> Renaming just to match an operation name doesn't justify it for me in 
> this case. It may also do a full-replace if --force is specified, btw.
> 
> So, if we were to re-name the command we would have to review the 
> arguments too.
> Would 'upload' enable by default? Or it would only if --enable is 
> specified (with server groups in the domain mode)?
> Should enable be a separate command? Which would accept server groups, 
> etc? This would mean two commands instead of one to actually deploy an app.
> 
> What would "undeploy" be renamed to? "remove" seems to be too general. 
> unload? remove-deployment?
> 
> Alexey