[jboss-as7-dev] Deployment terms in CLI

[Brian Stansberry]

On 6/22/11 6:58 AM, Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
> On 06/22/2011 01:47 PM, Heiko Braun wrote:
>>
>>
>> I wouldn't mind if the command stays the way it is.
>> But then the operation name on a deployment needs to be changed.
>> For instance to :enable and :disable opposed to :deploy, because that already
>> taken by the command name.
>>
>> It would make sense, because the deployment carries and attribute name "enabled" already.
>
> This makes sense. And probably will be consistent with other things.
> E.g. data sources chose enable/disable as names.
>

I can register "enable" and "disable" commands easily enough. I assume 
"deploy" and "undeploy" have to stay for CR1 as it will break the 
console otherwise.

>> If just look at the CLI on it's it makes perfect sense they way you build it.
>> But if regards the operation, the CLI commands, and the model description
>> you will realize that all three diverged at some point and rely on their own specific terms.
>
> Agreed, they should be aligned where possible. Although there will still
> be some differences, since higher level commands might translate into
> different operations (including composite) depending on the conditions
> and arguments.
>
> The new approach to commands I am working on right now will help with this.
>
> Alexey
>
>>
>> Ike
>>
>>
>> On Jun 22, 2011, at 1:18 PM, Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
>>
>>> Just re-naming the current deploy command to upload doesn't sound nice
>>> to me.
>>> Because the command actually deploys the package (unless you add
>>> --disabled). So, it's as clear as it can be.
>>>
>>> Renaming just to match an operation name doesn't justify it for me in
>>> this case. It may also do a full-replace if --force is specified, btw.
>>>
>>> So, if we were to re-name the command we would have to review the
>>> arguments too.
>>> Would 'upload' enable by default? Or it would only if --enable is
>>> specified (with server groups in the domain mode)?
>>> Should enable be a separate command? Which would accept server groups,
>>> etc? This would mean two commands instead of one to actually deploy an app.
>>>
>>> What would "undeploy" be renamed to? "remove" seems to be too general.
>>> unload? remove-deployment?
>>>
>>> Alexey
>>
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
> jboss-as7-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev


-- 
Brian Stansberry
Principal Software Engineer
JBoss by Red Hat