[jboss-as7-dev] JBoss Invocation Usability Question

[Richard Opalka]

On 05/03/2011 12:24 AM, Stuart Douglas wrote:
> Creating an empty table may change the message that you get, but it will not add any extra functionality.
>
> Using the line numbers from the superclass does not make sense, as there is no correlation between the proxies bytecode and the superclass bytecode.
>
> > From that message it sounds like you are trying to set a breakpoint into the proxy directly. Normally when debugging proxies I set a breakpoint in the calling code, then just keep hitting 'Step Into' until I get to the proxy handler.
Thanks for suggestion.

Rio
> Stuart
>
>
> On 03/05/2011, at 12:30 AM, David M. Lloyd wrote:
>
>> On 05/02/2011 09:22 AM, Richard Opalka wrote:
>>> Hi Folks,
>>>
>>> I'm not the java class file format familiar so asking in public.
>>> Would it be possible to update jboss-invocation generated byte code
>>> so the proxies it generates would be debugable?
>>> I'm facing the usability issue. I have an EJB3 impl class and when trying
>>> to debug its methods I'm getting the following error in IDE (see
>>> attachment).
>> Yeah I think we can use some of the line number information from the
>> superclass, maybe (it might not make sense).  I can chat with Stuart
>> about it.
>>
>> At the least we can create an empty table, or maybe figure out what
>> reflection proxies do and do that.
>> -- 
>> - DML
>> _______________________________________________
>> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>> jboss-as7-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
> jboss-as7-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev

-- 
Richard Opalka
ropalka at redhat.com
JBoss, by Red Hat

Office: +420 222 365 200
Mobile: +420 731 186 942