[jboss-as7-dev] Default Configuration Namespace

Darran Lofthouse darran.lofthouse at jboss.com
Fri Sep 23 10:13:06 EDT 2011


Is there any longer term policy for how we handle the removal of items 
from a schema?

We tend to make use of enumerations for the elements and attributes that 
are written -  wonder if these could be used to 'discover' a minimum 
schema version for what was written.

Regards,
Darran Lofthouse.


On 09/23/2011 03:01 PM, Jason T. Greene wrote:
> Thanks for reminding me of this problem. We need to do the latter, but
> we are unfortunately doing the former. The problem this causes is that
> if you upgrade to a patched release of AS, and then you deploy
> something, and then decide you need to revert back you are hosed. The
> deployment triggered a write to the config, which now has too new of a
> version.
>
> On 9/23/11 8:57 AM, Darran Lofthouse wrote:
>> Also one more question.
>>
>> Which version should the server now be writing when the configuration is
>> persisted?
>>
>> Do we have a policy for everything to write using the latest schema
>> version or are we going to be trying to use the version specified until
>> new elements/attributes are encountered?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Darran Lofthouse.
>>
>>
>> On 09/23/2011 02:33 PM, Darran Lofthouse wrote:
>>> Now that 7.0.2 is out and the only subsequent planned releases are for
>>> 7.1 can we switch the namespace for all default configuration to
>>> 'urn:jboss:domain:1.1'?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Darran Lofthouse.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>>> jboss-as7-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>> jboss-as7-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>
>


More information about the jboss-as7-dev mailing list