[jboss-as7-dev] TS: Bad approach used as fallback mechanism for gathering IP address
Brian Stansberry
brian.stansberry at redhat.com
Fri Mar 2 11:16:04 EST 2012
On 3/2/12 8:04 AM, Stuart Douglas wrote:
>
> On 03/03/2012, at 12:31 AM, Pavel Janousek wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've investigated some issue now and seen there are several places in TS where we can see similar code like this:
>>
>> static final String someIPproperty = System.getProperty("<some key>", "localhost");
>>
>> or
>>
>> static final String someIPproperty = System.getProperty("<some key>", "127.0.0.1");
>>
>> As you can see above, this fallback mechanism is bound in this case (key value isn't found) to IPv4 only IP address at all. This approach is bad because we can run in other network stack - IPv6 is presented in these days - and in this case the such testcase fails with some strange error due to this issue.
>
> The fallbacks are there for cases when no other stack is specified. As of today the test suite should honour all setting specified by the node0 and node1 addresses. If you are running under another network stack and have configured the build properly then these fallbacks should never be hit, they will only be used in the normal mvn install case with not other addresses set.
>
> To be honest this sort of fallback should probably be implemented in the pom, so that the system properties are always defined. Feel free to volunteer to fix it.
>
+1; it would be nice to know these are always set in the pom. Then when
reviewing a patch, the presence of "localhost" or "127.0.0.1" is grounds
for kicking it back, with no need to even think about it.
> Stuart
>
>
>>
>> I think we have two option how to resolve this issue:
>>
>> 1) Don't use fallback mechanism at all and fix (= remove) them in present testcases
>>
>> 2) Create auxiliary class which return 127.0.0.1 or ::1 string (but not string "localhost" because we can't be sure how it is translated (*))
>>
>> (*) common setup in Linux is to translate localhost -> 127.0.0.1 and localhost6 -> ::1
>>
>>
>> Ad 1) I prefer this option because some forget/miss setting is very easy to catch
>>
>> Ad 2) This auxiliary class should need to make some magic decision in which IP network stack mode we are now running and return IPv4 or IPv6 lookpack address accordingly.
>>
>> WDYT about this?
>>
>> --
>> Pavel Janousek
>> Senior JBoss QA Engineer
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>> jboss-as7-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
> jboss-as7-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
--
Brian Stansberry
Principal Software Engineer
JBoss by Red Hat
More information about the jboss-as7-dev
mailing list