[jboss-as7-dev] order of import statements

[David M. Lloyd]

I don't care about the package import order, but if there's going to be 
a standard I'd strongly urge people to put static imports *after* the 
package import block.  And like I said earlier, package * imports are 
bad, but static * imports are usually OK.

On 10/10/2012 10:25 AM, Brian Stansberry wrote:
> +1.
>
> And I know a year or so ago a number of IDEA users tweaked their configs
> to follow the eclipse standard Jeff listed, so my vote is this becomes
> the standard.
>
> On 10/10/12 9:46 AM, Jason Greene wrote:
>> I do agree that we should avoid lots of reordering, but IMO one thing that would help (to Jeff's point) is if we did have an official standard for it.
>>
>> On Oct 10, 2012, at 5:06 AM, Carlo de Wolf <cdewolf at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/09/2012 09:53 PM, David M. Lloyd wrote:
>>>> If
>>>> a file is very offensively formatted, I could see considering a
>>>> specific, dedicated commit whose sole purpose and content is to clean up
>>>> the whitespace (i.e. absolutely no functional changes), but other than
>>>> that... no.
>>>
>>> Even then I would reconsider it, because it makes for a hell should
>>> cherry-picking or history analysis be needed.
>>>
>>> Carlo
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>>> jboss-as7-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>> jboss-as7-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>>
>
>


-- 
- DML