[jboss-as7-dev] EJB Over HTTP

Eduardo Martins emartins at redhat.com
Tue Sep 4 11:37:16 EDT 2012


Hi Jaikiran, when can we progress on this one? :)

-- E

On Aug 28, 2012, at 8:29 AM, Jaikiran Pai <jpai at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Monday 27 August 2012 08:15 PM, Jason Greene wrote:
>> 
>> The client side should either require a separate, independent, ejb client library or a plugin library that works with the existing one. I will defer that architectural choice to Jaikiran. Note that because of the long term route being different, we should ensure that the code is not too tied to this particular approach.
> I prefer having a plugin that can just provide an implementation of a 
> EJBReceiver which communicates via HTTP. The current EJB client library 
> should have enough support to just plug this implementation without 
> having to change the core implementation to support this. Of course, 
> there might be a few things which we might not have thought of but we 
> can take that on a case by case basis.
> 
> Once I clear off my email pile up, to sort out any priority tasks, I'll 
> join IRC to discuss more on this.
> 
> -Jaikiran
>> 
>> 
>> On Aug 27, 2012, at 9:09 AM, Eduardo Martins<emartins at redhat.com>  wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi everyone, I'm about to (finally) start working on EJB over HTTP, which seems to be an essential feature that we had in previous AS versions.
>>> 
>>> I don't know much yet about the previous design and implementation, but here is a doc wrt AS5 that explains it: https://community.jboss.org/wiki/EJB3OverHTTPHTTPSInJBossAS-5
>>> 
>>> The JIRA issue for this development is https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4714 , which contains already some ideas for the implementation.
>>> 
>>> So, first question, anyone knows if the old design and/or implementation was good enough to be migrated? Or perhaps someone knows if it had any issues?
>>> 
>>> In a IRC chat and in the JIRA issue, websockets and xnio were mentioned as possible foundations for the AS7 implementation, which would mean to discard previous code already at low level. What is the reasoning for this, i.e., what advantages does the adaption of either of these bring to the feature and to AS7 as a whole?
>>> 
>>> Your contribution on this feature discussion is very welcome, thanks ;-)
>>> 
>>> -- E
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>>> jboss-as7-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>> jboss-as7-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
> jboss-as7-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev




More information about the jboss-as7-dev mailing list