[jboss-as7-dev] [AS7-5477] Allow processing of the module phase to be deferred

Thomas Diesler thomas.diesler at jboss.com
Tue Sep 25 11:12:17 EDT 2012


The use of the SVH probably needs more work. Currently, there are 
multiple paths that could make a bundle resolve and hence cause the 
processing of DUP chain. If there is an error in a post module phase 
it's not clear how that would be handled. Specifically, a rollback 
should not cause the deployment to get undeployed. I'll think of a few 
tests about this.

--thomas

On 09/25/2012 04:26 PM, Thomas Diesler wrote:
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-5477
>
> https://github.com/tdiesler/jboss-as/tree/as5477
>
> On 09/25/2012 04:24 PM, Thomas Diesler wrote:
>> Stuart,
>>
>> I implement the first cut of this as we talked about.
>>
>> The DeferredModuleUseProcessor adds a the module service as a dependency
>> on the next phase, which is FISRT_MODULE_USE. This is actually something
>> I previously already did for resolved bundles - now I do it always in
>> this DUP.
>>
>> The DeploymentUnitPhaseService makes Phase.FISRT_MODULE_USE passive if
>> it sees explicitly named services in
>> Attachments.DEFERRED_MODULE_DEPENDENCIES
>>
>> The processing is currently limited to OSGi only and this patch should
>> not effect other deployment types. The OSGi testsuite passes completely
>> with a few deployments hanging in Phase.FISRT_MODULE_USE before they
>> triggered to proceed by an explicit API call which resolves the bundle
>> and hance makes the module service available.
>>
>> TODO:
>>
>> * Think about whether Phase.FISRT_MODULE_USE should always depend on the
>> Module service
>> * Remove all module == null checks in FISRT_MODULE_USE DUPs and after.
>>
>> cheers
>> --thomas
>>

-- 
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thomas Diesler
JBoss OSGi Lead
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



More information about the jboss-as7-dev mailing list