[jboss-as7-dev] How to verify a patches for non-public AS

Dimitris Andreadis dandread at redhat.com
Wed Apr 17 10:21:59 EDT 2013


At least the next EAP 6.1.0.Beta shouldn't be long, as long as it includes the fix.

On 17/04/2013 12:55, Thomas Diesler wrote:
> The upstream process is fine.
>
> This thread is about bugs <https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBEAP-8> reported against EAP
> 6.1.0.Alpha1 <https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBEAP/fixforversion/12321330>
>
> On Apr 17, 2013, at 12:47 PM, Darran Lofthouse <darran.lofthouse at jboss.com
> <mailto:darran.lofthouse at jboss.com>> wrote:
>
>> All issues should be going upstream first anyway into what is currently marked as AS8 if
>> that is what you mean?
>>
>>
>> On 17/04/13 11:16, Thomas Diesler wrote:
>>> Hi Darran,
>>>
>>> this does not work. There is no living soul in QA that could verify my patch and
>>> guarantee that it works for the reporter. For good reason, we distinguish between
>>> Resolved/Closed - only the reporter of an issue can make the transition from Resolved to
>>> Closed.
>>>
>>> I'd say this process is broken.
>>>
>>> I suggest we do all work in jboss-as until an issue is not only Resolved but also Closed.
>>> Closed issues can be picked up by QA and the associated commits cherry-picked and
>>> whatever other voodoo they do in their non-public systems.
>>>
>>> As it stands now the reporter has to wait until the next EAP release before he can know
>>> whether his issue is truly fixed. That is obviously broken, isn't it?
>>>
>>> cheers
>>> --thomas
>>>
>>> On Apr 17, 2013, at 10:20 AM, Darran Lofthouse <darran.lofthouse at jboss.com
>>> <mailto:darran.lofthouse at jboss.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thomas - to get it into EAP it must have also had a BZ which means it
>>>> would be verified by QE.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Darran Lofthouse.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 17/04/13 09:12, Thomas Diesler wrote:
>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>
>>>>> when I resolve a bug for EAP, how can the reporter verify that the patch is working so
>>>>> that the issue can be closed?
>>>>>
>>>>> cheers
>>>>> --thomas
>>>>> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> Thomas Diesler
>>>>> JBoss OSGi Lead
>>>>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>>>>> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>>>>> jboss-as7-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:jboss-as7-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>>>> jboss-as7-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:jboss-as7-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>>>
>>> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Thomas Diesler
>>> JBoss OSGi Lead
>>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>>> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Thomas Diesler
> JBoss OSGi Lead
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
> jboss-as7-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>

-- 
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dimitris Andreadis
Software Engineering Manager
JBoss Application Server
by Red Hat
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

http://dandreadis.blogspot.com/


More information about the jboss-as7-dev mailing list