[jboss-as7-dev] cant get rid of jetty maven plugin - so lets mavenize JBoss Modules
David M. Lloyd
david.lloyd at redhat.com
Wed Feb 27 18:10:23 EST 2013
On 02/27/2013 08:45 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
>
>
> On 2/26/2013 4:23 PM, David M. Lloyd wrote:
>> On 02/26/2013 03:19 PM, Fernando Nasser wrote:
>>> I probably should mention my motivations...
>>>
>>> The future generation of RPMs will install the JAR files in a maven layout, so we just need to point the modules.xml to that location.
>>> No more symlinks!
>>
>> It will be just in time to be obsolete again. TBH I don't think this is
>> a smart move at all; Maven isn't the end state for Java build, and it
>> makes zero sense for Java distribution other than development/test time.
>>
> Can you please share with us exactly how using a maven repo makes no
> sense?
*Having* the ability to load a module from a Maven repo may or may not
make sense; that's a different branch of the thread. Using a Maven repo
for OS distribution though seems kinda pointless - it's an arbitrary
layout which I still believe will not survive Java 9 (though of course I
might be wrong about that; I've been wrong once or twice in the past,
believe it or not).
> I keep waiting to hear your legendary insight, but instead I'm
> just getting a bunch of unsubstantiated claims and some nonsense that
> maven repos aren't going to exist in the future...Myself and others have
> given some pretty compelling use cases. It would be nice to hear a
> counter-argument so we can have a real discussion over this instead of
> just excepting your word as gospel.
You shouldn't accept my word as gospel, nor should you accept my
skepticism as denial. I don't think there's any problem with being
cautious about this kind of change, and I don't think you can fault me
for wanting to be certain that it fits in with (i.e. doesn't actively
hamper) our long-term hopes and plans for Java 9 modularity.
--
- DML
More information about the jboss-as7-dev
mailing list