[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of POJO Server] - Re: JBAS-1841 - ServiceController/Microcontainer integration

[adrian@jboss.org]

"scott.stark at jboss.org" wrote : 
  | Do we want to synch up with all the current head changes and make another javaee cts branch or do this mc/vdf/profilesevice work in a branch?
  | 

That's your call. The changes I've made shouldn't affect
anything. It is intended to be 100% backwards compatible.

anonymous wrote : 
  | In terms of "Should the ServiceController create the Kernel internally
  | or should it be created by the ServerLoader and "injected"
  | in the ServiceController?", can't this only be the latter? Currently the profileserivce version of the ServerLoader/ServerImpl (which is in head but not used by default: org.jboss.system.server.profileservice.ServerImpl) creates a single kernel for the entire server.
  | 

Ok, That decides that. Just need a new constructor
new ServiceController(Kernel kernel)
or a setKernel() method.

anonymous wrote : 
  | Back to the discussion of allowing interaction between legacy mbeans and new kernel beans how can this be done unless they are in the same kernel?
  | 

Yes, there should be one kernel. I do plan to support
heirarchical kernels in the future when I get the scoping finished,
e.g. being able to deploy a DataSource at the JMS subsystem level 
or deploy aspects into an AOPDomain at the deployment level
but even these should be off one root.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3962953#3962953

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3962953