[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Started: jBPM WS frontend

[alex.guizar@jboss.com]

My suggestions:
anonymous wrote : document/rpc type? Document. Amenable to XS validation by the underlying stack, and faster to process than RPC. Web services are moving away from RPC.

anonymous wrote : JSR109 compliant? Why not JSR-181? JSR-181 web services are so much easier to mantain. JDK 1.5 is a requisite, but most WS customers do not seem to have a problem with that. Do you require JDK 1.4.2 compatibility in your workplace?

anonymous wrote : Other stacks?? JSR-109 or JSR-181 already give you portability. They don't prescribe the use of a full J2EE app server. JBossWS can run on plain Tomcat thanks to the microcontainer. XFire also supports JSR-181. There is no reason to go out of our way to support non-standard deployment models.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3965832#3965832

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3965832