[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of POJO Server] - Re: ManagementView changes

[scott.stark@jboss.org]

"charles.crouch at jboss.com" wrote : 
  | 
  | 4) We need the concept of a deployment type in order to support retrieving all ManagedObject's/deploymentName's of a particular type e.g. DataSource
  | 
  | either 
  | public List<ManagedObject> getViews(ProfileKey key, DeploymentType deploy)
  |   |       throws NoSuchProfileException, IOException
  |   | 
  | or
  | 
  |   | public List<String> getDeploymentNames(ProfileKey key, DeploymentType deploy)
  |   |       throws NoSuchProfileException, IOException
  | 

I think we need to flesh out the ManagedObject to deployment metadata mapping issue to define this. The ManagedPropertyRef I had previously dealt with the notion of a collection of properties using the context notion:


  | public class ManagedPropertyRef
  | {
  |    /**
  |     * A namespace context that maps the managed property onto a managed view
  |     * context (e.g., /, /DataSource, /DataSource/Pool).
  |     */
  |    private String context;
  | 

Part of the property mapping definition should be a classification of the property from the perspective of an admin tool. In reality a property may be in multiple view/perspectives if we start talking about view likes "Server Ports", "Clustering", "Network Interfaces".


View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3995705#3995705

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3995705