[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBossCache] - Re: Injection of MBeanServer

[manik.surtani@jboss.com]

anonymous wrote : 
  | The JMX integration should be a layer independent of the core class. 
  | 

Definitely a +1.  Hate the hard-coded MBean interfaces in the 1.x series.  :-)

anonymous wrote : 
  | Manik, one thing this implies is a compile-time dependency in JBC on the microcontainer jars. I think that was an inevitability anyway. We could avoid this by having the JMX integration in the AS cluster module or the fledgling cluster project, but that seems ugly. 
  | 

Yes, I see this as an inevitability too.

anonymous wrote : 
  | There's still legacy code in TreeCache that let's TreeCache register itself w/ JMX; I'll remove that tomorrow once others get a chance to read this thread and express any opinions.
  | 

+1 from me.



View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3984156#3984156

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3984156