[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: ESB Packaging

[mark.little@jboss.com]

"sacha.labourey at jboss.com" wrote : Kevin,
  | 
  | two questions for you:
  | 
  | 1) why do you want to wait for the MC (or an OSGi personality on top of the MC) in order to compenentize the ESB? Is that by lack of time or by lack of features from the MK?
  | 

Time. Too much to do for the 4.0 release so we agreed to drop a couple of things until the next release.

anonymous wrote : 
  | 2) from a cofiguration standpoint, why are you relying on a TS specific configuration mechanism rather than on the AS/MK/MC standard mechanism? Per lack of feature of the MK or for some other reason?
  | 

See above. How the current configuration plays in an MC environment is up for grabs in the next release. But at the moment, the configuration files and PropertyManager are far superior to what was there in the beta release IMO.

anonymous wrote : 
  | Also, while I might be wrong, I do think the current ESB properties are JVM-wide: I think they are being loaded by the System Properties MBean, but I might be wrong. 
  | 
  | On the two points above, I think they are pretty important as they really define how new users will discover our ESB and learn how to use/configure it. 

Sacha, you may be looking at the Beta release. That's different to the GA/trunk, which is what Kevin has been discussing.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3988741#3988741

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3988741