[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBossCache] - Re: Documenting Limitations of FileCacheLoader

[bstansberry@jboss.com]

Elias Ross (aka genman) submitted it.

There's a comment in JdbmCacheLoader javadoc: "Does not support transaction isolation."

"Manik Surtani" wrote : To be honest, I tend to recommend not using this at all in production. I think a much better bet would be the JDBM cache loader, which is pretty poorly documented at the moment. 
  | 

Hmm.  The default passivation cache for EJB3 SFSBs and HttpSessions (Hany's work) both use FCL.  Some other options:

1) Use JDBCCacheLoader working off of DefaultDS.  We of course recommend using a production DB to replace Hypersonic; this becomes another reason to do this.  And now that production db needs to have the appropriate tables or let JDBCCacheLoader create them.

2) Use JdbmCacheLoader.  Now we've got another embedded db.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3980523#3980523

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3980523