[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: why javasist and jboss retro

david.lloyd@jboss.com do-not-reply at jboss.com
Tue Oct 31 10:37:15 EST 2006


"tom.baeyens at jboss.com" wrote : also please add a bit about the motivations to move to the sun JSF impl.

The main reason was so I could take advantage of f:phaseListener.  I think that once myfaces gains JSF 1.2 support, we could probably make it interchangable.

"tom.baeyens at jboss.com" wrote : i would guess that the move to suns jsf impl also implied the move to sun-servlet/2.5/lib/servlet-api.jar and sun-servlet/2.5/lib/jsp-api.jar

The servlet 2.5 jars are just so that I can use jbossretro on JSF.  JBoss 4.0.4 is using tomcat 5.5, which I think implements the 2.4 spec?  In any case, the 2.5-specific classes that it was complaining about pertain to JSP, so we're safe there.

If someone were running under a 5.0 JRE they could use the 2.4 servlet jars and bundle the original jsf-api and jsf-impl jars instead.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3982112#3982112

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3982112



More information about the jboss-dev-forums mailing list