[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Semantics of no local for a durable subscription

[timfox]

Well, if that is true you will have the some strange effects.

E.g.

Connection conn1 sends message m1

conn1 creates consumer with no local = true.

conn1 sends message m2

consumer closes without receiving anything

conn1 sends message m3

conn1 creates consumer with no local = false

consumer receives m1

consumer receivers m3

(no m2!!)

My opinion is that no local should only apply to the *consumer* of the subscription (the subscriber), not the subscription itself, which is the way it currently is and has been for some time, and passes TCK.

I just to wanted to clarify since the spec is a bit fuzzy about this.



View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3970947#3970947

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3970947