[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Action Processing Pipelines on Listeners/Pollers...

[tfennelly]

"estebanschifman" wrote : Shouldn't the  element lie within the  element
  | as in the example code ?  We could thus have different listeners performing different sequence of actions.
  | 
  | 
  |   | <EsbConfig command-queue-class="org.jboss.soa.esb.command.InMemoryCommandQueue"
  |   | 	command-queue-name="test-queue"
  |   | >
  |   | 
  |   | 	<ListenerConfig
  |   | 		listenerClass="org.jboss.soa.esb.util.MockPoller"
  |   | 		actions="X12N837-to-HL7V3, Process-HL7V3-Claim, HL7V3-to-X12N837, Route-to-Claims"
  |   | 		maxThreads="1"
  |   | 	>
  |   | 
  |   | 	<Actions>
  |   | 		<!-- 
  |   | 			Under the new architecture I think these will be equivalent to "Contracts Definitions"? 
  |   | 		-->
  |   | 		<Action name="X12N837-to-HL7V3" processor="Smooks" />
  |   | 		<Action name="Process-HL7V3-Claim" processor="ClaimsProcessor" />
  |   | 		<Action name="HL7V3-to-X12N837" processor="Smooks" />
  |   | 		<Action name="Route-to-Claims" processor="SocketRouter">
  |   | 			<property name="address" value="xxxxx" />
  |   | 		</Action>
  |   | 
  |   | 		<ProcessorAliases>
  |   | 			<!-- 
  |   | 				Under the new architecture I think these will be equivalent to "Services"?  The alias "name" being like the Service URN.
  |   | 			-->
  |   | 			<Alias name="Smooks" class="org.jboss.soa.esb.actions.SmooksTransformActionProcessor" />
  |   | 			<Alias name="ClaimsProcessor" class="com.acme.health.ClaimsProcessor" />
  |   | 			<Alias name="JmsRouter" class="org.jboss.soa.esb.actions.JmsRouter" />
  |   | 			<Alias name="SocketRouter" class="org.jboss.soa.esb.actions.SocketRouter" />
  |   | 		</ProcessorAliases>
  |   | 	</Actions>
  |   | </ListenerConfig>
  |   | 
  |   | </EsbConfig>

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3971056#3971056

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3971056