[jboss-dev-forums] [Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Need a NamedObject SimpleMetaType

[scott.stark@jboss.org]

Thinking about the type issue more, I originally was writing tests that had the security-domain property be a Name type as that is how the code is still written. Typically one would have the property be the dependent interface type that one would use, but the security domain bean is not used directly by jca. There is an indirection because jaas is used with a configuration name, and that is what really needs to be matched up between the jca security-domain property and some security domain bean implementation. In this case the Name type is correct in that its describing a dependency on another component, but is too weak in terms of validating what that component provides. What one wants to validate is that the security domain bean provides a jaas login configuration for the indicated name. Don't know how to validate that at this point.


View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4070188#4070188

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4070188