[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: MessageType design

mark.little@jboss.com do-not-reply at jboss.com
Fri Aug 3 06:47:59 EDT 2007


"tcunning" wrote : I think I agree with Kurt on CommandMessage - I'm not sure it really has to be a special type of ObjectMessage.
  | 

Maybe. It seemed to fit the simplification/view approach.

anonymous wrote : 
  | For the stats gathering, I think we were planning on excluding all CommandMessages from the counts - basically because there's the potential for them to skew the statistics a great deal.      
  | 
  | We're going to have to check each Message to see if it is a CommandMessage, so whatever allows you to determine that should be pretty lightweight, especially if there are a lot of Messages being processed by the ESB.      Is isCommandMessage going to be fast enough?    

It should be fast enough. All it's doing is looking at the presence (or absence) of the command name in the Body.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4070490#4070490

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4070490



More information about the jboss-dev-forums mailing list