[jboss-dev-forums] [Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Need a NamedObject SimpleMetaType

[adrian@jboss.org]

The point I was trying to make before was that it probably be easier
for the mangement layer to deal with a map, so an alternative markup
might be to define on the collection:


  | @MangementObject
  | public class SecurityDeployment
  | {
  |    // login-config.xml has many policies
  |    @ManagedProperty(managed=true map-id="name" id-qualifier="SecurityDomain")
  |    Collection<SecurityPolicy> getPolicies();
  | }
  | 

Then the profile service when it does getProperty("policies")
would get a TableMetaValue of String(id/name)->ManagedObject
instead of having to iterate over an array of managed objects.

It's still a Collection underneath, we've just exposed it as a map
(since we know it has a unique id) for ease of use.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4070708#4070708

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4070708