[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBoss Transaction Services] - Re: Metadata Support for Transactional Web Services

[mark.little@jboss.com]

"maciej.machulak" wrote : "maciej.machulak" wrote : Hello,
  |   | 
  |   | At this moment my code relies on the API provided by XTS. What I thought of is that it might be nice to have some sort of a transaction factory which would provide me with common methods for creating and enlisting participants in Business Activities. It would hide details of the underlying transaction service. I could then encapsulate implementation specific code and make the overall framework easier to extend. 
  |   | 
  | 
  | But of course the framework would still rely on XTS. It will be just much easier to replace XTS with some other transaction service - possibly not related to Web Services.
  | 

Support for compensation transactions is limited. Plus there are a range of different extended transaction models that we can support in JBossTS that other TMs simply can't. I wouldn't worry about making this portable: making it powerful/more flexible with JBossTS is the way to go.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4071402#4071402

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4071402