[jboss-dev-forums] [Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Rip out JBoss JMX implementation?

[adrian@jboss.org]

"adrian at jboss.org" wrote : 
  | 3) JMX Interceptors/XMBean - although this should work in any JMX, Scott broke it a while ago - the XMBean is now tied to the MBeanRegistry for some bizarre reason?
  | 
  | ...
  | 
  | In practice, if (3) was fixed then we could move (2) into an XMBean interceptor
  | (where it belongs)

It's on my TODO list for JBoss5 to complete of the @JMX annotations and advices
currently prototyped in aop-mc-int (I've been waiting for the
proposed annotations that will be defined in Java7 by JMX2.0 -
these were proposed recently on that spec committe)
This is would replace most of our use cases for XMBean.

Since it will be aop based (i.e. you can configure what advices implement the
annotations), we can also decorate/instrument the POJOs
for JSR77 and other useful management features at the same time.

http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMICROCONT-71

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4073900#4073900

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4073900