[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBMESSAGING-808 - Fail

[timfox]

"clebert.suconic at jboss.com" wrote : that works (besides the other synchronized case where ACKed already happened).
  | 
  | I'm doing these changes:
  | 
  | - Adding a method on the postOffice, as I didn't want to deal with PM on the ServerConnectionEndpoint neither to expose PM on PostOffice:
  | 

It's ok to talk to the pm directly. I don't see the value of adding methods to the postoffice if they then just talk directly to the pm.

anonymous wrote : 
  | - On FailoverValveInterceptor, I'm adding a header to the JBossMessage when a failure occurs.
  | 
  | - I will also set a flag on TransactionRequest (protected boolean retry) but I will need to change the wireFormat a little bit to cope with that.

I would prefer send() and sendTransaction() to be dealt with consistently.

I.e. add a new parameter in both cases rather than a header.

Yes, this would involve changes (add a boolean) to the wireformat and change of the signature of send() and sendTransaction().


View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4011664#4011664

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4011664