[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of EJB 3.0] - Funky config needed for extended PersistenceContext replicat
bstansberry@jboss.com
do-not-reply at jboss.com
Thu Feb 15 22:31:05 EST 2007
AFAICT, to get replication of an SFSB with an extended PersistenceContext to work, your persistence.xml needs to declare the "hibernate.session_factory_name" property, e.g.:
| <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
| <persistence>
| <persistence-unit name="tempdb">
| <jta-data-source>java:/DefaultDS</jta-data-source>
| <properties>
| <property name="hibernate.session_factory_name" value="tempdb"/>
| <property name="hibernate.hbm2ddl.auto" value="create-drop"/>
| </properties>
| </persistence-unit>
| </persistence>
|
Without this, when the EntityManager is deserialized on the remote node, you get this:
| Caused by: java.io.InvalidObjectException: could not resolve session factory during session deserialization [uuid=8a8b8eac10c785e70110c788056b0001, name=null]
| at org.hibernate.impl.SessionFactoryImpl.deserialize(SessionFactoryImpl.java:1056)
| at org.hibernate.impl.SessionImpl.readObject(SessionImpl.java:1892)
| ... 78 more
|
To avoid the IOException, Hibernate needs a name for the factory, which is provided via the property. But having to specify that property seems funky. Could the value of the persistence-unit element's name attribute be passed to the SessionFactory as its name?
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4017398#4017398
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4017398
More information about the jboss-dev-forums
mailing list