[jboss-dev-forums] [Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Scoped Kernels

[adrian@jboss.org]

"alesj" wrote : "adrian at jboss.org" wrote : 
  |   | I think we mentioned this with aliases and inner un-named beans.
  |   | Any other place?
  | 
  | I'm saying that even before then we (probably before you got involved)
  | discussed not using ControllerContext.getName() as the key to store the state
  | but use a ControllerContext.getId() which would be a system generated 
  | unique id. See UUID in the common module.
  | 
  | It was discussed in the context of giving better error messages
  | when two deployments have the same name for a context.
  | 
  | Currently you get a failure upfront about trying to install a duplicate context
  | when you should get a summary at the end saying one (or maybe both?) is not installed
  | because it has a duplicate name.
  | 
  | It also supports the "anonymous" bean concept better since the name becomes
  | "optional". It is only used in the external api when somebody wants to do
  | give me a context by name (e.g. an explicit dependency injection).
  | 
  | But I think it is a bit too close to the JBoss5-beta2 release to do this
  | refactoring at the moment.
  | If you are going to do it, it would be better if it was on a branch in SVN.
  | This is probably also true of the scoping development in general?

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4022428#4022428

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4022428