[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBoss Remoting, Unified Invokers] - Re: jboss/remoting 2.2.0.Alpha7 not compatible with jboss5

[ovidiu.feodorov@jboss.com]

"scott.stark at jboss.org" wrote : If you don't care about http, then why did you say "Messaging needs remoting HTTP support...". That dependency links to an http stack regardless of what it is. 
  | 

OK. That's fine with us. But why do I have to specify a specific HTTP stack version? Why can't we just say "we use Remoting 2.2.0 and whatever Remoting 2.2.0 uses as HTTP stack"

Remoting 2.2.0 was presumably tested with several HTTP stacks, let them decided what's best. 

IF I have to specify that I depend on jboss-remoting-core.jar 2.2.0 and jboss-remoting-http.jar 2.2.0, that's perfect. If this is all we need to do, then the story is over. We're happy.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4022724#4022724

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4022724