[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Failover refactoring

ovidiu.feodorov@jboss.com do-not-reply at jboss.com
Thu Jan 4 14:55:48 EST 2007


"clebert.suconic at jboss.com" wrote : > (and not the other local queues, as it was the case so far) 
  | 
  | We had routers taking care of this, balancing between local queues and failedover queues. Did you change this policy?

No. This comes in top of the message pull policy, that it still in effect (well, right now it isn't since we're using a NullMessagePullPolicy, but if we were using one, it would be in effect).

These behaviors complement each other.

And by thew way, this reminds me that we should also test the pull policy, currently we have 0 tests for it.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3998044#3998044

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3998044



More information about the jboss-dev-forums mailing list