[jboss-dev-forums] [Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Recent changes Microcontainer

[adrian@jboss.org]

"alesj" wrote : Using KernelConfigFactory to get KernelConfig (which  can provide this)?
  | 
  | Putting KernelConfig instance into Configurator?
  | It's a 'loop' usage. Looks wrong.
  | 
  | I see we are already using KernelConfig as a parameter.
  | Doing it the same here (adding it as a parameter in resolveProperty method)?
  | If I do this (just tried), then almost every method in Configurator needs it. Yuck.
  | 
  | Any other ways / ideas?
  | 

It is the KernelConfigurator that has this information.

The problem is that the current code uses a static singleton as a delegate
AbstractKernelConfigurator -> Configurator
so one way to fix would be to move the code to the AbstractKernelConfigurator
that needs kernel specific config.

Perhaps a simpler solution is to expose the TypeInfoFactory on the TypeInfo interface.

You would then be able to do

  | TypeInfoFactory typeInfoFactory = beanInfo.getClassInfo().getTypeInfoFactory();
  | TypeInfo typeInfo = typeInfoFactory.getTypeInfo(name, classLoader);
  | 

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4002844#4002844

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4002844