[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of POJO Server] - Re: JAXBDeployer

[scott.stark@jboss.org]

"jason.greene at jboss.com" wrote : 
  | Either way the mapping of namespace to classes has to be known before unmarshalling, the difference is that you can lazy load classes with JBossXB.    If lazy discovery is important, we should get involved with the spec and get it added.   
  | anonymous wrote : 
  |   | The more immeadiate question is whether getting involved with jaxb to get jbossxb features into it is worth while. 
  |   | 
  |   | "jason.greene at jboss.com" wrote : 
  |   |   | The issue with a mapping like this is that if there is any similarity between the types that could be present on a wildcard, then using schema subtyping is more appropriate.
  |   |   | 
  |   | I don't see how that resolves the problem. That just introduces a common base schema type for the interface, but it still has a wildcard because the implementation details are outside of the contract. This is a common issue with a plugin architecture.
  |   | 

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4007049#4007049

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4007049