[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: process patch files

tom.baeyens@jboss.com do-not-reply at jboss.com
Sat Jun 9 06:29:46 EDT 2007


"david.lloyd at jboss.com" wrote : That's a novel approach - but I think there is one main problem with it as suggested: we don't want users to actually be able to change the graph structure of their existing process (more specifically, anything that we consider to be static in the process definition) - we want them to be able to change *anything else* but that (like classes, extra process files [like images] or auxiliary XML data like GPD information).
  | 
  | Maybe there could be a way to provide a process patch where just classes and files are provided, and changes to the XML that are not related to graph structure.  Maybe a separate schema/DTD for updates that can clearly express this requirement.

could you explain why you make the difference between changing the graph structure and other changes ? 

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4052786#4052786

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4052786



More information about the jboss-dev-forums mailing list