[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: Build System Meeting Agenda Mar 01, 2007
scott.stark@jboss.org
do-not-reply at jboss.com
Fri Mar 2 19:12:07 EST 2007
How is the repository selected?
While being able to make dev releases is good, a release that is incorporated into a shared build still cannot be an arbitrary thing. Having a graph of unstable dependencies on items in a snapshot release state is a bad thing. If I put out a 2.0.0.Beta3 build of the mc to the snapshot repository and link jbossas to it, I don't expect that it will change. Certainly not in an incompatible way. Why not have a single maven repo under svn where only devs with release tech permission can put out non-snapshot releases? Does svn support that type of filename pattern permissions or is it only path based?
Having the repo under svn (not cvs due to refactoring problems) is a good thing for tracking who changed what.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4024787#4024787
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4024787
More information about the jboss-dev-forums
mailing list