[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: IsLocalInterceptor not detecting local container

[bstansberry@jboss.com]

The use case you just described for EJBTHREE-773 is the typical one I hear about when people complain about the local optimization.

In a way, I like not forcing the call to go locally, as it removes a mechanism whereby an SFSB could end up being invoked on 2 different servers.

(I just opened a related thread on the proper behavior of the FirstAvailable load balance policy, please see  http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=103967. Bill B, you're listed as original author on FirstAvailable, so any comments on that thread are appreciated.)

Re: the  2 cluster problem, should the partition name be part of the ejbName for a clustered EJB?  That doesn't really solve the problem though, as you can have two network-isolated clusters both named DefaultPartition.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4027630#4027630

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4027630