[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: task node implementation

[david.lloyd@jboss.com]

"tom.baeyens at jboss.com" wrote : In the first approach, we could just add Task to the pvm package.  Process languages should have the ability to ignore that member field.

I like this approach best.  If users don't want to use tasks, they can just ignore the property with no harmful effects.  This is better than going back to a modular system in my opinion, and for users who do want tasks in their process language, it will be far easier on them.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4031989#4031989

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4031989