[jboss-dev-forums] [Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Lifecycle aspects revisited

[kabir.khan@jboss.com]

"adrian at jboss.org" wrote : The default implementation is to callback on the ControllerContext,
  | 
  | i.e. the last step is necessarily going to happen if the context implementation
  | does not extend AbstractControllerContext.
  | 
You mean if a ControllerContext impl does NOT extend AbstractControllerContext then we miss out on the callbacks.

"adrian at jboss.org" wrote : 
  | I'm arguing that the lifecycle callbacks should apply to at least all 
  | AbstractControllerContext implementations, not just POJO.
  | 
I agree and understand that
"adrian at jboss.org" wrote : 
  | Ales thinks that ControllerContextAction should be part of the API so it would
  | apply everywhere?
Whereever it goes I think it will be a trivial change, so I will wait for you two to figure out whether it is part of the AOP or not. In any case the "lifecycle information holder" (currently LifecycleBeanMetaData) will need renaming/moving into something visble from the dependency project.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4032081#4032081

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4032081