[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: Plug-able default JNDI binding policy
ALRubinger
do-not-reply at jboss.com
Fri Nov 2 18:40:11 EDT 2007
+1.
Current implementation is dependent on packaging, which, while ensuring namespace-based unique values, immediately breaks all applications once JAR names change, are placed into an EAR, etc.
Bean providers must currently override default names using their own homebaked solution; I'd heavily made use of LocalBinding/RemoteBinding on every EJB just for this purpose. Pluggable policy would address this in one fell swoop.
S,
ALR
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4101486#4101486
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4101486
More information about the jboss-dev-forums
mailing list