[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBossCache] - Re: JBCACHE-816 vs JGRP-105

[bela@jboss.com]

It is better to have an interceptor because the CacheListeners don't know about transactions (maybe they do, now ?). So PUT1, PUT2, PUT3 in a TX would all get replicated with a CacheListener, and - when rolling back the TX - the UNDO ops would get replicated too.
This is not the case with an interceptor.
Yes, interceptors are tied to JBossCache,, but this solution *is* for JBossCache, so no worries from my side.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4102593#4102593

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4102593